Written for your account
Not a template and not tips everyone already knows. Someone from our team studies the accounts you applied with and your recent feed against the four judging criteria and writes down what they see.
02Judging
Every entry is checked by hand, every entrant receives a personal report, and an independent jury scores against the same four published criteria. Here is exactly how it works.
The process
After entries close on 15 November, we check that every entrant is 18 or over, lives in the UK, posts in English and owns the account they applied with. A person, not a tool, then looks at how followers grew and who comments. Accounts with bought followers or engagement go no further. We then place each entry in the categories your profile fits.
Our team writes every entrant a report on their own account: what already works, and what to sharpen before judging. It is included in the fee. What is in it.
Seven weeks to put the report into practice. The jury follows the accounts you applied with and looks at everything you publish in this period, so progress counts.
Each juror scores each entry against the four weighted criteria before seeing anyone else’s scores. Jurors do not score entrants they know personally or work with, and never see the reports.
The jury discusses the highest-scoring entries in each category and agrees up to six finalists. A juror with a conflict leaves the room for that category.
We write to every entrant on the same day, finalist or not. Finalists receive their posted invitation in the first week of February.
Winners are announced on stage at the awards evening. The jury also chooses The Muse of the Year from all finalists.
Included in your entry
Not a template and not tips everyone already knows. Someone from our team studies the accounts you applied with and your recent feed against the four judging criteria and writes down what they see.
By email on Monday 30 November, once every entrant’s 14-day cancellation period has ended. Questions about it can go to hello@themuseawards.group.
The report is written by our team, not by the jury. Jurors never see it, it does not predict a result, and every entrant receives one in the same depth.
The criteria
| Criterion | Weight | Scores high | Scores low |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aesthetic | 40% | A recognisable eye: light, palette, styling and composition that are clearly yours. | A look borrowed from trends or from another creator. |
| Consistency | 30% | The look holds across months and formats, not in one lucky post. | Strong single posts with no thread between them. |
| Originality | 20% | Work others reference rather than repeat. An idea, format or treatment that is yours. | Templates, trending audio and formats used as they come. |
| Community | 10% | How people respond: real comments, saves and conversation. Not how many follow. | Large numbers with little real response, or signs of bought engagement. |
Ninety per cent of the score is the work itself. Follower count is not a criterion.
The jury
Five to seven people from the creator scene, brand marketing, photography and the press, including at least one member with no link to us or to any partner.
Names are announced before judging begins, each with a short note on why they were asked. Jurors appear on this site only once they have agreed in writing to be named.
Fair by design
The binding rules are in the Entry Rules, sections 8 to 11.
The MUSE Awards London · 2027
€20 per entry, your personal account report included. Entries close at 23:59 UK time on Sunday 15 November.
Apply with your profile